Dialogue With the Stars: A Hypothetical Meeting

You: Those two souls are G.I. Gurdjieff and P.D. Ouspensky, can you imagine that. For starters, tell me please, what planetary aspect would explain the following. "That one week in 1947, the aged, tired, sick Ouspensky held a series of six question and answer sessions in London where he told his followers flatly that he had failed. His System didn't work. It was a lie. There wasn't any higher truth. They should go home and find themselves. He was hostile and uncommunicative. Shortly after, on the 2nd October, he died."

The Alchemist: In classical astrology, the planetary aspect that might illuminate this period of despair and disillusionment for Ouspensky is the Saturn Opposition Moon (0.34°). This aspect is highly significant and indicative of the emotional and existential challenges he was likely facing during that time.

Saturn, the planet of restriction, duty, and reality, when in opposition to the Moon, the celestial body governing emotions and the unconscious mind, creates a profound tension. This aspect suggests a period where emotional burdens become overwhelming, and the weight of reality may crush the spirit. The Moon's need for comfort and emotional security is hindered by Saturn's cold, hard truths, leading to feelings of isolation and emotional desolation.

For Ouspensky, this aspect would have manifested as a deep internal struggle, a crisis of faith in his life's work, and a perception that his efforts were in vain. Saturn's influence could have exacerbated feelings of failure and disappointment, contributing to the public renunciation of his teachings. The Moon's emotional turmoil, coupled with Saturn's harsh judgment, could explain his hostile and uncommunicative demeanor during those sessions.

Thus, the Saturn Opposition Moon aspect reveals the potential for a period of profound introspection, existential questioning, and emotional hardship, culminating in his eventual passing. It underscores the classical principle that moments of great adversity often coincide with the most challenging planetary alignments.

You: What, starry-wise, made their bond so deep and, ultimately, tragic?

The Alchemist: The astrological interplay between G.I. Gurdjieff and P.D. Ouspensky is illuminated by a series of classical inter-aspects that capture both the depth and complexity of their relationship, as well as its ultimate tragic undertones.

Sun Sextile Mercury (0.16°): This aspect suggests a strong intellectual rapport and communication. The Sun represents the core essence or purpose, while Mercury governs the mind and communication. Their connection here would have facilitated a dynamic exchange of ideas, making their shared pursuits intellectually stimulating and deeply engaging.

Sun Trine Mars (2.15°): This harmonious aspect indicates a robust and energized bond, with Mars contributing assertiveness and drive to the Sun's creative vitality. This inter-aspect would have fueled their collaboration, allowing them to work effectively towards common goals with enthusiasm and vigor.

Sun Conjunction Jupiter (7.55°): While slightly wide, this conjunction suggests a relationship imbued with optimism and a sense of shared purpose. Jupiter's expansive influence on the Sun's core identity could enhance mutual growth and philosophical exploration, reinforcing their collective pursuit of higher truths.

Venus Square Saturn (1.35°): Herein lies a key to the tragic dimension of their bond. Venus, the planet of harmony and affection, when squared by Saturn, the planet of restriction and duty, introduces a challenging dynamic. This aspect suggests potential obstacles in emotional connection, where feelings of love and appreciation might be met with coolness or perceived barriers. It could indicate a struggle to balance personal affection with the weight of responsibilities, contributing to an underlying tension in their relationship.

Saturn Opposition Moon (0.34°): This aspect underscores emotional difficulty, where Saturn's sobering influence opposes the Moon's emotional needs. In their interaction, it might manifest as a struggle to reconcile emotional fulfillment with the demands of their shared work. This could lead to feelings of isolation or emotional dissatisfaction, adding to the tragedy of their bond.

Through these aspects, we see a relationship rich with intellectual engagement and shared purpose but also marked by emotional challenges and an eventual sense of unfulfilled potential. The interplay of benefic and malefic influences creates a tapestry of connection that is both profound and ultimately bittersweet.