Conjunctions:
Sun(1) (16° in Taurus) conjunct Moon(2) (16° in Taurus): 0°46' from exact.
Oppositions:
Venus(1) (26° in Aries) opposite Jupiter(2) (24° in Libra): 2°24' from exact.
Sextiles:
Mars(1) (3° in Libra) sextile Sun(2) (3° in Leo): 0°3' from exact.
Sun(1) (16° in Taurus) sextile Venus(2) (17° in Cancer): 1°11' from exact.
Semisextiles:
Moon(1) (15° in Gemini) semisextile Mercury(2) (14° in Cancer): 0°53' from exact.
Moon(1) (15° in Gemini) semisextile Moon(2) (16° in Taurus): 0°54' from exact.
Summary: Sun(1) is prominently featured in both a conjunction and a sextile, anchoring structural connectivity. Moon(1) appears in two semisextiles, revealing a pattern of close geometric interaction. Venus(1) forms an opposition, providing a structural pivot against Jupiter(2). Mars(1) establishes the most exact aspect of the configuration, a sextile linking to Sun(2). Overall distribution (without modification of default orbs): 3 Conjunctions, 1 Opposition, 3 Sextiles, 2 Semisextiles, and 2 Quincunxes.
Dominant Aspects:
The synastry exhibits a dominant sextile, with three such aspects indicating communicative harmony. Among these, the Mars(1) sextile Sun(2) dominates due to its close orb, showing acute geometric precision. The Sun(1) and Moon(2) conjunction in Taurus exemplifies a strong, foundational alignment of identity and emotional nature.
Structural Tensions:
The inclusion of sharp and dynamic geometric features like three conjunctions and three squares indicates pronounced structural tension zones in the chart, balancing the softer thematic overlap of sextiles and semisextiles. Venus(1)'s opposition with Jupiter(2) is a significant structural tension point, representing a core difference in values and expansion.
Summary: This celestial chart is a tapestry of harmony and friction. The Sun, Moon, Venus, and Mars are prominently recurring figures, weaving a story of intense connection, intellectual synergy, and eventual ideological divergence. The strong alignments suggest a powerful initial bond, while the squares and opposition point to the fundamental conflicts that would ultimately define their legacy.
Mars (1) sextile Sun (2):
Mars in Libra's diplomatic arena forms a harmonious sextile with the regal Sun in Leo. This blends Martian choleric energy with Solar authority, favoring dynamic engagement and collaboration. The drive for action (Mars) finds a creative and authoritative outlet (Sun), suggesting an initially powerful and mutually reinforcing intellectual partnership.
Sun (1) conjunct Moon (2):
The Sun at 16° in Taurus aligns with the Moon at 16° in Taurus. This potent conjunction merges Solar (identity) and Lunar (emotion) influences in a fixed earth sign. It points to a profound, stabilizing force, a shared grounding in tangible reality, and a mutual appreciation for building enduring structures—in their case, the very foundations of psychoanalysis.
Sun (1) sextile Venus (2):
The Taurean Sun forms a sextile with Venus in Cancer. Here, the Sun's stable, determined nature harmonizes with Venusian phlegmatic qualities, offering potential for nurturing and protective exchanges. This connects the earthy sensuality of Taurus with the deep emotional bonds of Cancer, indicating a relationship with the capacity for both structure and care.
Venus (1) opposite Jupiter (2):
Venus in fiery Aries opposes Jupiter in Libra. This reflects a core tension between Venus's desire for direct, personal assertion and Jupiter's expansive quest for balance and philosophical justice. The initiator (Aries) stands against the mediator (Libra), a polarity that suggests a fundamental clash between personal drive and broader social or ethical principles.
Summary: The chart reveals a potent alchemical vessel. The powerful Sun/Moon conjunction in Taurus provided the prima materia—a shared, grounded foundation. However, the dynamic polarity of Venus and Jupiter introduced a separatio, a necessary division between personal passion and philosophical vision. These celestial tensions describe a relationship destined for both profound synergy and eventual, transformative schism.